The John Merck Fund
 

Environment

Starting in 2010, The John Merck Fund's environment grantmaking was separated into three program areas (Clean Energy, Environmental Health, Regional Food Systems).  Grants made previously through a broader Environment Program are listed below.

2009 Grants

2009  |  2008  |  2007  |  2006  |  2005  |  2004  |  2003

The New England Environment

Air Quality, Clean Energy and Climate Change

Climate Counts$15,000

To publish a comparative analysis examining the costs of continuing to operate New Hampshire's only coal-fired power plant versus employing clean energy alternatives.

Connecticut Fund for the Environment$35,000

To identify cost-effective strategies for meeting Connecticut's carbon cap, implement and enforce efficiency building codes, and design model financing programs to increase efficiency investments.

Conservation Law Foundation$60,000

To reduce greenhouse gas emissions throughout New England by encouraging increased reliance on renewable energy sources and energy efficiency, and full implementation of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.

Environment Northeast$100,000

To implement comprehensive energy policy reform in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island, that will shift nearly $1 billion to energy efficiency; advocate for upgrades to a regional transmission system that promotes renewable power; and work at the federal level to promote leading-edge energy and climate policy lessons learned from New England.

Jordan Institute$40,000

To help New Hampshire reduce greenhouse gas emissions by increasing energy efficiency in buildings, particularly in the commercial and industrial sectors.

Natural Resources Council of Maine$35,000

To boost energy efficiency, advance wind power development, and build support for climate action and other clean energy initiatives in Maine.

Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships$100,000

To assist Northeast states in adopting and implementing energy efficiency policies.

Regulatory Assistance Project$50,000

To improve design and implementation of the Northeast's Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in order to assess its efficacy and share best practices with designers of a federal cap-and-trade program.

Vermont Public Interest Research and Education Fund$35,000

To identify and implement innovative approaches to promote renewable energy and energy efficiency in Vermont.

> back to top


Environmental Health

Clean Water Fund$125,000

To reduce exposures to toxic chemicals by winning fundamental reform of chemicals policy in Connecticut, while contributing to the national movement for precaution and safer alternatives.

Environmental Health Strategy Center$50,000

To recognize 2009 Sparkplug Award winner, Environmental Health Strategy Center Executive Director, Michael Belliveau.

Environmental Health Strategy Center$100,000

To protect human health from toxic chemical exposures where we live, work and play, in 2010 by: ensuring strong implementation of Maine's precedent-setting safer chemicals policy; participating in a national coalition to comprehensively reform federal chemicals policy based on the Maine model; and cultivating a new generation of state leadership as safer chemicals champions.

Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy$125,000

To protect Minnesotans from toxic chemicals in consumer products through a health-based campaign that achieves near-term chemical policy successes while building toward comprehensive state and national reforms.

Learning Disabilities Association of Maine$25,000

To protect human health from toxic chemical exposures where we live, work and play, in 2010 by: ensuring strong implementation of Maine's precedent-setting safer chemicals policy; participating in a national coalition to comprehensively reform federal chemicals policy based on the Maine model; and cultivating a new generation of state leadership as safer chemicals champions

Maine Department of Environmental Protection$5,000

To provide professional facilitation for a stakeholder group reviewing the problem of toxic chemicals in children's products in Maine.

Maine Labor Group on Health$9,000

To protect human health from toxic chemical exposures where we live, work and play, in 2010 by: ensuring strong implementation of Maine's precedent-setting safer chemicals policy; participating in a national coalition to comprehensively reform federal chemicals policy based on the Maine model; and cultivating a new generation of state leadership as safer chemicals champions.

Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association$10,000

To protect human health from toxic chemical exposures where we live, work and play, in 2010 by: ensuring strong implementation of Maine's precedent-setting safer chemicals policy; participating in a national coalition to comprehensively reform federal chemicals policy based on the Maine model; and cultivating a new generation of state leadership as safer chemicals champions.

Maine People's Resource Center$53,500

To protect human health from toxic chemical exposures where we live, work and play, in 2010 by: ensuring strong implementation of Maine's precedent-setting safer chemicals policy; participating in a national coalition to comprehensively reform federal chemicals policy based on the Maine model; and cultivating a new generation of state leadership as safer chemicals champions.

Maine People's Resource Center$20,000

To collaborate with Maine's Native American leaders to build support for reform of federal chemicals policy among Native communities nationally.

Maine Women's Policy Center$17,500

To protect human health from toxic chemical exposures where we live, work and play, in 2010 by: ensuring strong implementation of Maine's precedent-setting safer chemicals policy; participating in a national coalition to comprehensively reform federal chemicals policy based on the Maine model; and cultivating a new generation of state leadership as safer chemicals champions.

Natural Resources Council of Maine$30,000

To protect human health from toxic chemical exposures where we live, work and play, in 2010 by: ensuring strong implementation of Maine's precedent-setting safer chemicals policy; participating in a national coalition to comprehensively reform federal chemicals policy based on the Maine model; and cultivating a new generation of state leadership as safer chemicals champions.

Physicians for Social Responsibility of Maine$15,000

To protect human health from toxic chemical exposures where we live, work and play, in 2010 by: ensuring strong implementation of Maine's precedent-setting safer chemicals policy; participating in a national coalition to comprehensively reform federal chemicals policy based on the Maine model; and cultivating a new generation of state leadership as safer chemicals champions.

Planned Parenthood of Northern New England$17,500

To protect human health from toxic chemical exposures where we live, work and play, in 2010 by: ensuring strong implementation of Maine's precedent-setting safer chemicals policy; participating in a national coalition to comprehensively reform federal chemicals policy based on the Maine model; and cultivating a new generation of state leadership as safer chemicals champions.

Toxics Action Center$12,500

To protect human health from toxic chemical exposures where we live, work and play, in 2010 by: ensuring strong implementation of Maine's precedent-setting safer chemicals policy; participating in a national coalition to comprehensively reform federal chemicals policy based on the Maine model; and cultivating a new generation of state leadership as safer chemicals champions.

> back to top


Protecting Farmland and Forests in Vermont

Food Works at Two Rivers Center$65,000

To expand the number and viability of the central Vermont farms within the Food Works network.

Highfields Institute, Ltd.$35,000

To promote on-farm composting and soil-building practices that create regenerative food and soil systems on Vermont farms.

Intervale Center$35,000

To provide incubation services for new farmers, support the development of land access partnerships, and take advantage of new land infrastructure opportunities within the Intervale.

Merck Forest & Farmland Center$40,000

To provide opportunities for students to create and participate in inquiry-based, professional-quality field research.

New England Working Landscapes$18,000

To promote agricultural economic development, land and job preservation and new, value-added entrepreneurial enterprises in Vermont.

Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont$25,000

To develop and implement a new technical assistance program model to meet the critical needs of Vermont's organic dairy farmers.

Rutland Area Farm and Food Link (RAFFL)$20,000

To support new farmers and economically viable farm operations in the Rutland area.

University of Vermont Institute for Artisan Cheese$50,000

To deliver comprehensive risk management services to Vermont cheesemakers to ameliorate microbiological risks in the cheesemaking environment.

Vermont Agency of Agriculture$15,000

To launch an annual event celebrating Vermont's leading position in the artisan and farmstead cheese industry.

Vermont Fresh Network$45,000

To promote local, fresh food in Vermont, including via development of a website that provides a gateway for all agro-tourism experiences in Vermont.

Vermont Housing & Conservation Board$60,000

To support the economic viability and environmental sustainability of Vermont agriculture and agriculturally related enterprises.

Vermont Sustainable Jobs Fund$20,000

To develop an agriculture strategic plan for the Farm to Plate Investment Program, and facilitate strategic investments in sustainable food systems.

Vital Communities$35,000

To provide Upper Valley farmers with enough viable markets so that their businesses can survive and expand.

> back to top


The Environment Beyond New England

Air Quality, Clean Energy and Climate Change

CERES: Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies$50,000

To catalyze the nation's largest public pension funds to reduce energy use in their real estate portfolios by investing in energy efficiency, encourage asset owners and managers to adopt best practices in efficiency, and spur companies they invest in to decrease energy use in real estate they build, control or manage.

Environmental Integrity Project$75,000

To protect public health from the dangers of toxic waste from coal-fired power plants by closing the loopholes that currently allow such waste to be disposed without any environmental rules or oversight.

Environmental Law and Policy Center of the Midwest$50,000

To implement strong energy efficiency policy initiatives in Iowa; and to successfully challenge a proposed major new coal plant in Michigan.

Michigan Environmental Council$50,000

To ensure that the Michigan Public Service Commission effectively implements new state-mandated energy efficiency standards; and to use the state's new Integrated Resource Planning process to prevent permitting for new coal-fired power plants proposed in the state.

Ohio Environmental Council$50,000

To protect and implement Ohio's recently adopted energy efficiency standards, and to advance important 'next generation' energy efficiency policies in the state.

Plains Justice$50,000

To support the transition to cleaner energy sources through public and business endorsement of strong energy efficiency standards for investor-owned and public utilities providing electricity and natural gas in Iowa.

Rockefeller Family Fund$60,000

To halt the development of new coal-fired power plants by stopping the flow of private and public capital into these investments.

Second Nature, Inc.$75,000

To make colleges and universities more sustainable by securing institutional commitments to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.

Sierra Club Foundation$75,000

To prevent construction of new coal-fired power plants in the Midwest and begin the orderly retirement of the region's existing fleet of coal-fired plants.

SmartPower$100,000

To create one of the largest community marketing initiatives promoting renewable energy and energy efficiency in the country by challenging cities and households to reduce net energy use by 20 percent.

The Land Institute$75,000

To establish efficiency initiatives in six diverse communities; recruit influential and vocal champions for energy efficiency across the state; persuade the Kansas Corporation Commission to treat efficiency as a priority; and promote a statewide energy efficiency standard.

> back to top


Environmental Health

Alaska Community Action on Toxics$50,000

To stimulate broad public support for implementing state, national and international chemicals policies that protect the health of Arctic people, wildlife and the environment from chemical pollution.

American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities$100,000

To raise awareness about the association between toxic chemicals and developmental disabilities and that those with developmental disabilities may face greater risks from chemical exposures; and to promote good health and reduced exposures by collaborating with environmental and other disability organizations to advance chemicals policy reforms.

Autism Society$100,000

To examine the expanding research on the connections between environmental toxins and autism; educate the society's primary constituency and others on the risks of environmental neurotoxicants; and work collaboratively with local and national environmental, health and disability groups for comprehensive chemicals policy reform.

Breast Cancer Fund$50,000

To harmonize state and federal advocacy seeking to ban the endocrine disruptor Bisphenol A from food and beverage containers, and to infuse public health and breast cancer prevention perspectives into the federal chemical policy reform debate.

Center for International Environmental Law$60,000

To win fundamental reform US domestic and foreign policy on hazardous chemicals and stimulate the United States' re-emergence as a global leader in achieving international protections from chemicals pollution.

Center for Progressive Reform$25,000

To develop and begin to implement an agenda for regulatory reforms of federal chemicals policies at the Environmental Protection Agency.

Clean Production Action$75,000

To advance the use of green chemicals through chemicals policy by gaining business support for chemicals policy reform, promoting safer alternatives to toxic chemicals, and disseminating safer alternatives using the 'Green Screen' Wiki (a web-based resource.)

Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health$35,000

To reduce and prevent environmentally related disease in children by informing pregnant women, parents, physicians, public interest organizations, policymakers and the media about Columbia's research findings.

Coming Clean$50,000

To reform the chemical industry so that it is no longer a source of harm through: chemical policy reform; promoting safe substitutes, clean production and green chemistry; developing strong communication tools; coordinating market campaigns; and championing environmental justice.

Commonweal$160,000

To educate national learning and developmental disabilities groups about environmental links to learning disabilities, translate emerging science, cultivate opportunities to support chemical policy reform, and increase the groups' collaboration and partnerships.

Ecology Center$110,000

To reduce children's and adults' exposure to toxic chemicals and protect health by achieving steps toward state and federal comprehensive chemicals policy reform.

Ecology Center$65,000

To accelerate demand for chemical policy reform through HealthyStuff.org, by broadly providing information about the presence of toxic chemicals in consumer products.

Environmental Defence$40,000

To extend Canada's precedent-setting ban on the endocrine-disrupting chemical Bisphenol A in baby products to all canned food containers.

Environmental Health Fund$150,000

To facilitate an integrated national campaign to reform US chemical policy while continuing state-level efforts to ban specific chemicals, market-based strategies to reduce chemicals use, and public interest representation within international deliberations to improve chemicals regulations.

Institute for Local Self-Reliance$50,000

To educate purchasers, policymakers and environmental and public health activists on the benefits and tradeoffs of biomaterials, and to guide the marketplace toward sustainable products.

International Chemical Secretariat (ChemSec)$48,000

To promote a market transition towards less toxic consumer electronic products, and stricter rules in the European Union, and potentially beyond, to control or eliminate the use of toxic chemicals in the electronics sector.

International Persistent Organic Pollutants Elimination Network (IPEN)$25,000

To advance international and national toxic chemicals reforms that reduce harm to human health and the environment from persistent organic pollutants.

Learning Disabilities Association of America$100,000

To raise awareness of environmental factors, particularly toxic chemicals, that can harm brain development and contribute to learning disabilities and behavior disorders; to prevent toxic chemical exposures, especially among pregnant women and children, through changes in chemical policies and practices; and to build a nationwide members' network working to reduce the incidence of learning disabilities in future generations.

Mercury Policy Project$75,000

To substantially reduce the mercury content of compact fluorescent lightbulbs, foster purchase of the least toxic and longest-lasting energy efficient lighting, and promote shared business responsibility financing for the recycling of discarded mercury-containing lightbulbs.

MomsRising$50,000

To use online and on-the-ground organizing to educate and mobilize mothers and families around environmental health issues such as toxic chemical exposure in consumer products, air quality, food and water safety.

National Caucus of Environmental Legislators$30,000

To improve state legislators' capacity to better defend and promote initiatives to ban the use of toxic flame retardants and other dangerous chemicals, inform legislators about policy options states can consider moving toward comprehensive chemical policy reform, and engage legislators in the federal chemical policy reform debate.

National Council of Churches$150,000

To engage people of faith in building support for comprehensive state and national chemical policy, and mobilize the faith community to lend its powerful moral voice to the ongoing and urgent debate around federal chemical reform policy.

Natural Resources Defense Council$75,000

To reduce the public's exposure to hazardous chemicals by promoting fundamental reforms of the federal regulatory structure.

Physicians for Social Responsibility-Greater Boston Chapter$50,000

To use the findings of the Environmental Threats to Healthy Aging report to move policies that will foster healthier living for all ages by building alliances with key organizations, particularly AARP.

Planned Parenthood Public Policy Network of Washington$26,880

To secure adoption of groundbreaking policy reforms that protect human health and the environment from the impacts of toxic chemicals while serving as a model for other states and a driver for federal reforms.

Product Policy Institute$35,000

To coordinate a national strategy that promotes extended producer responsibility policies; build momentum in eight states ready to consider those policies; establish extended producer responsibility as an effective tool to address climate change; and increase organizational capacity.

Product Stewardship Institute$10,000

To support 45 member states and more than 100 local government members in developing and implementing policies to minimize the release of mercury from fluorescent lamps.

Science and Environmental Health Network$45,000

To employ science, policy development and legal reforms in implementing the precautionary principle in state and federal chemicals policy.

State Alliance for Federal Reform of Chemicals Policy (SAFER)$90,000

To establish a new precautionary federal chemicals policy by 2015 by launching and winning a critical mass of comprehensive policy reform measures in key states to tip the balance for achieving reform at the federal level.

University of Massachusetts Lowell Center for Sustainable Production$40,000

To stimulate the design and application of safer chemicals and products consistent with principles of sustainable production and green chemistry, and to provide technical assistance to states and public advocates in reforming chemicals policies.

Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility$24,000

To secure adoption of groundbreaking policy reforms that protect human health and the environment from the impacts of toxic chemicals while serving as a model for other states and a driver for federal reforms.

Washington Public Interest Research Group Foundation$15,000

To secure adoption of groundbreaking policy reforms that protect human health and the environment from the impacts of toxic chemicals while serving as a model for other states and a driver for federal reforms.

Washington State Nurses Association$25,000

To secure adoption of groundbreaking policy reforms that protect human health and the environment from the impacts of toxic chemicals while serving as a model for other states and a driver for federal reforms.

Washington Toxics Coalition$134,120

To secure adoption of groundbreaking policy reforms that protect human health and the environment from the impacts of toxic chemicals while serving as a model for other states and a driver for federal reforms.

> back to top


Genetically Engineered Food and Agriculture

Center for Food Safety$225,000

To prevent any new approvals and/or commercialization of genetically engineered crops and contain the crops already approved by promoting strict environmental and human health federal and state regulations on genetic engineering, including mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food products already on the market; and to prevent monopolies on the global seed supply by opposing patents on seeds and corporate takeovers of seed companies.

National Family Farm Coalition$25,000

To advocate within the USDA's agricultural biotechnology rulemaking process for an appropriate balance between the interests of farmers and the environment and those of the biotech industry; and to educate and organize farmers through the new Farmers Rights, Farmers Choice Campaign.

Rural Advancement Foundation International-USA$35,000

To maintain 'certified organic' as a credible GE-free label; create a regulatory framework that recognizes the economic harm to farmers and rural communities from contamination by genetically engineered crops; and protect the right and capacity of farmers to grow non-GE varieties.

Union of Concerned Scientists$85,000

To promote a resilient agriculture system based on sustainable practices rather than one focused entirely on short-term productivity by: seeking a federal ban on the outdoor production of pharmaceutical and industrial crops; strengthening the regulatory framework for all agricultural biotechnology products; and assessing the role genetically engineered products and sustainable practices play in confronting the looming crises of global warming and food scarcity.

Western Organization of Resource Councils Education Project$55,000

To attempt to stop commercial introduction and any further planting of genetically modified crops, specifically alfalfa and wheat, until environmental, economic and health questions about the release of these plants into the environment can be answered and potential problems addressed.

> back to top